Charles Manson scarcely appears in “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood,”
the new Quentin Tarantino film. But the Manson family’s murderous home
invasions on the nights of Aug. 8 and 9, 1969, give the film its
narrative tension, and Manson’s aura hangs over the entire film, as it
should. The story of his band of hippies turned killers – mostly wayward
young women with a penchant for drugs, sex and knives – has transfixed
the nation for half a century, in a way that few other crimes ever have.
The slayings – seven people were butchered, including actress Sharon
Tate, who was eight and a half months pregnant — were a horror show that
brought the excesses of the decade into glittering focus. The nation,
transfixed, looked at the killings and saw the larger society
unraveling. Hippies, drugs, guns, celebrity, violence, racism,
counterculture revolution. It all blew up into the madness of a man who
wanted to ignite an apocalyptic race war by killing rich white people
and framing black people for it.
The Manson murders, Joan Didion famously wrote, ended the ‘60s.
“Helter Skelter,” prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi’s frightening book about
the killings, is still the bestselling true-crime book in U.S. history.
All three of Manson’s female co-defendants were sentenced to death,
likely the most women condemned to die in one incident in North American
jurisprudence since the Salem witch trials in 1692. (All five death
sentences in the case, including Manson’s, were later commuted to life
in prison following a U.S. Supreme Court decision.)
As the number of books, pop songs, films, documentaries and based-on
novels blossomed over the years, Manson became the primogenitor of the
“killer with something to say” trope, the idea that there’s this darkly
intelligent madman who’s onto something about the quivering underbelly
of the American dream. Like he was the Joker from Batman, brought to
life. Reporters flocked to his jail cell for interviews. He was profiled
on the cover of Rolling Stone in a 30,000-word story that dubbed him
“the most dangerous man alive.” His image — greasy black hair, grungy
beard, the “X” he cut into his forehead before his trial — was
emblazoned on T-shirts and posters. Guns N’ Roses recorded one of his
songs. Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails made a music video in the house
where Manson’s followers killed Tate and her friends. Rocker Marilyn
Manson used the killer for half of his stage name.
“I am what you made of me and the mad dog devil killer fiend leper is
a reflection of your society,” Manson said after his conviction.
“Whatever the outcome of this madness that you call a fair trial or
Christian justice, you can know this: In my mind’s eye my thoughts light
fires in your cities.”
He died in prison in 2017, at age 83.
Manson’s hold on the national imagination is preserved in the Library
in several ways – courtroom sketches, books, newspaper archives,
recordings – the most notable of which is the iconic drawing by the
legendary courtroom artist William Robles. Robles spent every day of the
nine-month trial sitting a few feet away from Manson, who, as he
remembers, “terrified people.” Once, when Robles accidentally knocked
over his sketching materials, making a clatter, he looked up to see
Manson suppressing a giggle, playfully running one index finger down the
other: The “shame on you” gesture.
“I could see how people were attracted to him,” Robles said in a recent interview. “He had an appeal, a warmth.”
It’s not as crazy a contradiction as it sounds.
Since the dawn of civilization, human beings have killed one another,
often for reasons that can neither be clearly articulated nor
understood, and this violent mystery goes to the heart of human nature.
Who are we? What are our ultimate taboos, and how do we respond when
these are violated? Crime, writ small or large, can therefore become a
shorthand, a brutal slash of insight, into the society that spawns it.
The first lines of Homer’s “The Iliad” — the foundational epic of
Western literature, composed about 2,800 years ago – describe the
murderous “anger of Achilles” that sent many a brave soul “hurrying down
to Hades.” The biblical Book of Genesis, another cornerstone of Western
culture, says that when the population of the Earth was four, Cain
killed Abel, reducing it to three.
The Library’s holdings on the meanings of murder range from ancient
manuscripts to Wild West ballads to most everything in between. Some of
these reflect the low arts of the “penny bloods,” the wildly popular
Victorian-era serial stories that presaged today’s tabloids. Others
achieve the status of high art, such as Truman Capote’s “In Cold Blood,”
the 1966 story of a multiple murder in Kansas that helped create the
true-crime-as-literature-and-social-commentary genre.
The roots of this run deep in the American bloodstream. After the
Civil War, the “Wild West” became a mythological landscape, a place
where murder, blood and cruelty became a romantic notion. Jesse James, a
Missouri-born bank robber and killer, became a cultural icon. Nearly a
century after James was gunned down, President Harry Truman, a fellow
Missourian, acquired his pistols and playfully posed with them – murder
weapons as presidential guffaws.
“It’s always been an American theme to make heroes out of the
criminals,” Johnny Cash, who himself made a career from songs of outlaws
and prisons, told Rolling Stone in 2000. “Right or wrong, we’ve always
done it.”
But it was only after Capote’s lyrical tale of murder in rural Kansas
that Americans began seeing nonfiction literature and serious art as
appropriate forums with which to address the nation’s violent culture
without the gauze of fiction. The “New Journalism” Capote and others
practiced on crime reporting became so influential that, today, we take
it for granted. Pulitzer Prizes, National Book Awards, Academy Awards –
all have all been given to tales of true crime. In 2016, ESPN Films
described “O.J.: Made in America,” its Academy Award-winning, eight-hour
documentary about the 1990s O.J. Simpson murder trial as “the defining
cultural tale of modern America – a saga of race, celebrity, media,
violence, and the criminal justice system.”
They might well have been describing the Manson case half a century
earlier. Robert Kirsch, the L.A. Times book editor, reviewing “Helter
Skelter” upon publication, seized on the crime’s significance. The book,
and others like it, he wrote, were attempting to understand the
frightening era in which they were living: “To accept these (killings)
as simply symptoms of the malaise of the times,” he wrote, “is to
abandon the obligations of civilization to rationally address even the
most irrational and fearful events.”
via https://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2019/07/charlie-manson-and-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood/
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen