„Being able to find, assess and place new research within a field of knowledge, is integral to any research project. For social scientists this process is increasingly likely to take place on Google Scholar, closely followed by traditional scholarly databases. In this post, Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduna-Malea , Mike Thelwall, Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar, analyse the relative coverage of the three main research databases, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus, finding significant divergences in the social sciences and humanities and suggest that researchers face a trade-off when using different databases: between more comprehensive, but disorderly systems and orderly, but limited systems.“via https://blog.digithek.ch/google-scholar-web-of-science-und-scopus/
Follower
Samstag, 4. Januar 2020
Google Scholar, Web of Science und Scopus
Der Artikel „Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: Which is best for me?“
im LSE Impact Blog erklärt die Unterschiede in der Abdeckung der
wissenschaftlichen Suchmaschinen Google Scholar, Web of Science und
Scopus (via ITL TUHH auf Twitter):
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen