Ingrid Dillo, Lisa de Leeuw: CoreTrustSeal
Abstract: Open data and data management policies
that call for the long-term storage and accessibility of data are
becoming more and more commonplace in the research community. With it
the need for trustworthy data repositories to store and disseminate data
is growing. CoreTrustSeal, a community based and non-profit
organisation, offers data repositories a core level certification based
on the DSA-WDS Core Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements catalogue
and procedures. This universal catalogue of requirements reflects the
core characteristics of trustworthy data repositories. Core
certification involves an uncomplicated process whereby data
repositories supply evidence that they are sustainable and trustworthy. A
repository first conducts an internal self-assessment, which is then
reviewed by community peers. Once the self-assessment is found adequate
the CoreTrustSeal board certifies the repository with a CoreTrustSeal.
The Seal is valid for a period of three years. Being a certified
repository has several external and internal benefits. It for instance
improves the quality and transparency of internal processes, increases
awareness of and compliance with established standards, builds
stakeholder confidence, enhances the reputation of the repository, and
demonstrates that the repository is following good practices. It is also
offering a benchmark for comparison and helps to determine the
strengths and weaknesses of a repository. In the future we foresee a
larger uptake through different domains, not in the least because within
the European Open Science Cloud, the FAIR principles and therefore also
the certification of trustworthy digital repositories holding data is
becoming increasingly important. Next to that the CoreTrustSeal
requirements will most probably become a European Technical standard
which can be used in procurement (under review by the European
Commission).
Keywords: CoreTrustSeal; certification; repository;
trusted digital repository; requirements; standard; policy; process;
service; self-assessment; review; digital preservation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31263/voebm.v71i1.1981
Veröffentlicht in Mitteilungen der VÖB 71 (2018) Nr. 1, S. 162-170
Online: https://ojs.univie.ac.at/index.php/voebm/article/view/1981/
via https://www.univie.ac.at/voeb/blog/?p=46804
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen