Rape,
infighting, secrets, financial malpractice; the scandal surrounding the
Nobel Prize in Literature began in November 2017 when Swedish newspaper
Dagens Nyheter published
allegations by eighteen women that they had been sexually assaulted by
Jean-Claude Arnault, a 71-year-old Swedish-French photographer. Arnault
was married to Katarina Frostenson, a member of the Swedish Academy, and
over the following months the man who boasted to be the “19th member of
the committee” was accused of 20 years of sexual assaults, including
incidents at properties owned by the Academy—not to mention other
illegal activities, such as leaking the names of soon-to-be laureates,
which are subject to heavy betting. By this past October, when the
Stockholm district court unanimously sentenced Arnault to two years in
prison for rape, seven of the academy’s eighteen members had already
quit in protest, and no prize was awarded for 2018. As permanent
secretary Anders Olsson stated, “We find it necessary to commit time to
recovering public confidence … before the next laureate can be
announced. This is out of respect for previous and future literature
laureates, the Nobel Foundation and the general public.”
The hiatus is over; this week the Nobel Foundation announced
that it will award two prizes for literature in 2019. It is also taking
steps to address some of the issues raised by the Arnault scandal, like
appointing five external members to help select the Nobel laureates,
considering a time limit on membership, and reviewing how to handle
resignations and expulsions. For the first time, it will eject any
members who are subject to conflict of interest or criminal
investigations.
No conflict of interest, no criminals. These are certainly steps in the
right direction, yet they’re so obvious and overdue that you have to
wonder what exactly we’ve been so impressed by all these years. It feels
a bit like getting to Oz only to realize the Wizard is a tiny man
hiding behind a green curtain, shouting “look away!”—though in this case
the Wizard is an exclusive group of Academy members who serve for life
and who have kept the Nobel prize process a closely guarded secret. The
group is so small that when seven members resigned last year, it caused a
crisis and left less than the minimum twelve-person quorum to pick a
winner. We know that the Academy reviews around 200 nominations in
February, then announces a shortlist in May, and a final five in the
summer, but the full explanation of why a winner was chosen is sealed in
the Nobel archives, only to be released 50 years later. During the
scandal the Nobel Foundation itself criticized the Academy for how it
has “cultivated a closed culture over a long period of time.” ... [mehr] https://electricliterature.com/do-we-still-need-the-nobel-prize-in-literature-64ec1fd340cc
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen