Some essays are letters into the future. “The Prevention of Literature” is one such essay, and today I’d like to respond to it from 2018.
Orwell
argues that totalitarianism makes literature impossible. By literature,
he means all kinds of writing in prose, from imaginative fiction to
political journalism; he suggests that verse might slip through the
cracks. He writes, too, that there is such a thing as “groups of people
who have adopted a totalitarian outlook”—single-truth communities of
sorts, not just totalitarian regimes or entire countries. These are
deadly to literature as well.
Orwell was writing in 1946, five or
seven years before scholarly works by Hannah Arendt, on the one hand,
and Karl Friedrich, on the other, provided the definitions of
totalitarianism that are still in use today. Orwell’s own “Nineteen Eighty-Four,”
which provides the visceral understanding of totalitarianism that we
still conjure up today, was a couple of years away. Orwell was in the
process of imagining totalitarianism—he had, of course, never lived in a totalitarian society.He imagined two major traits of
totalitarian societies: one is lying, and the other is what he called
schizophrenia. He wrote, “The organized lying practiced by totalitarian
states is not, as it is sometimes claimed, a temporary expedient of the
same nature as military deception. It is something integral to
totalitarianism, something that would still continue even if
concentration camps and secret police forces had ceased to be
necessary.” The lying entailed constantly rewriting the past to
accommodate the present. “This kind of thing happens everywhere,” he
wrote, “but is clearly likelier to lead to outright falsification in
societies where only one opinion is permissible at any given moment.
Totalitarianism demands, in fact, the continuous alteration of the past,
and in the long run probably demands a disbelief in the very existence
of objective truth.”
He goes on to imagine that “a totalitarian
society which succeeded in perpetuating itself would probably set up a
schizophrenic system of thought, in which the laws of common sense held
good in everyday life and in certain exact sciences, but could be
disregarded by the politician, the historian, and the sociologist.” ... [mehr] https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/how-george-orwell-predicted-the-challenge-of-writing-today
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen