The problem of the 20th century is the problem of the color line,
author and civil rights pioneer W.E.B. DuBois famously wrote in “To the
Nations of the World,” the culminating address of the first Pan-African
Conference, held in 1900 in London. Issued by the gathering of prominent
black leaders from America, the West Indies and Africa, the address
served as a cautionary yet aspirational statement: racism was a problem,
but one the 30 delegates hoped to remedy as a new century dawned.
The conference was a first step toward not only uniting the black
global diaspora, but also establishing a black internationalism that
would come into its own in the years after World War II. The burgeoning
political movement played a critical role in dismantling European
colonialism in Africa and Asia.
In Feb. 1919, nearly two decades after the 1900 conference, the first
Pan-African Congress took place, and once again DuBois was at the
center of its proceedings. It was held adjacent to the Paris Peace
Conference, the meeting convened to create a lasting peace following the
Great War. The Pan-African Congress attempted to secure a place for
peoples of African descent within the new world order.
The Library of Congress’ online exhibition, Echoes of the Great War: American Experiences of World War I,
provides insights into the 1919 congress, which in many ways served as a
model for future congresses, as a forum for uniting the global black
diaspora and as a means for setting a course for black internationalism.
DuBois traveled to France in Dec. 1918 as a representative of the
NAACP, confident that the Paris Peace Conference provided the ideal
setting for a parallel gathering of black dignitaries from around the
world to discuss the international problem of racism. “Every attempt
must be made to present the case of the Darker Races of the world to the
enlightened public of Europe,” DuBois wrote to the NAACP’s board.
With the help of French parliamentarian and Senegalese native, Blaise
Diagne, DuBois hastily arranged the congress. Unfortunately, few
African representatives could attend because colonial governments
refused to allow them passage to Paris; numerous African-Americans
similarly failed to make the trek since the U.S. government blocked
their attempts to reach the French capital.
Undaunted, DuBois, Diagne and 55 other participants from 15 nations
gathered in Paris over three days in February. The largest cohort
included African-Americans such as DuBois and activists Rayford Logan
and Addie Waites Hunton.
The debates that unfolded were far from revolutionary and in many
ways reflected both the diffuse nature of black internationalism and the
Western biases of Diagne and Dubois. As a member of the French
parliament and a beneficiary of colonialism, Diagne carefully avoided
critiquing imperial France in any meaningful way. Educated in America
and Germany, DuBois had absorbed Western thought in regard to Africa,
and he never really pushed for the full autonomy of African colonies.
Instead, he believed they needed Western guidance to bring them to
political maturity. The system that emerged from the Paris Peace
Conference reflected much the same view in that it failed to grant full
autonomy to several former colonial states.
Some delegates to the Pan-African Congress were, however, more
militant. They included delegates from the West Indies and others such
as John Archer, leader of the newly created African Political Union and
the first person of African descent elected to the English parliament.
In a Nov. 1918 speech, Archer conveyed his general thoughts on African
self-governance, reflecting the anti-imperial attitude he brought to the
conference: “I am not asking,” he said. “I am demanding.”
Whatever its flaws, the Pan-African Congress began the critical
process of defining and implementing black internationalism. Three more
congresses would take place in the 1920s, followed in 1945 by a
Pan-African Congress held in Manchester, England. In attendance were
African independence leaders Kwame Nkrumah, later prime minister and
president of Ghana, and Jomo Kenyatta, later prime minister and
president of Kenya, as well as the West Indian Marxist George Padmore.
With a tide of independence movements gaining speed, the delegates
called for an end to imperialism and for full independence. DuBois
contributed to the gathering, but more as a respected figurehead rather
than a driving force.
In the aftermath of World War II, during the 1950s and 1960s, much of
Africa and Asia emerged newly independent. Given the agency of
colonized peoples and the weakness of postwar Europe, imperialism no
longer proved feasible. African-Americans, too, asserted their
independence through the civil rights movement, with the Southern
Christian Leadership Conference, the NAACP, the Student Non-Violent
Coordinating Committee, the Congress on Racial Equality and others
demanding racial equality.
The 1919 Pan-African Congress was a precursor to such international
developments. Together with the experience of having chafed mightily
under discriminatory policies of the segregated U.S. military during
World War I, the congress instilled in African-Americans “a racial
consciousness and racial strength that could not have been gained in a
half century of normal living in America,” Addie Waites Hunton noted.
The color line would continue to bedevil the West, and particularly the
United States, but the stakes had been raised and the fight engaged. The
results are still unfolding.
via https://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2019/02/african-american-history-month-first-pan-african-congress/
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen