FOR: Ulysses,
of course, is a divine work of art and will live on despite the academic
nonentities who turn it into a collection of symbols or Greek myths. I
once gave a student a C-minus, or perhaps a D-plus, just for applying to
its chapters the titles borrowed from Homer while not even noticing the
comings and goings of the man in the brown mackintosh. He didn’t even
know who the man in the brown mackintosh was. Oh, yes, let people
compare me to Joyce by all means, but my English is pat ball to Joyce’s
champion game.
–Vladimir Nabokov, in a 1965 interview
AGAINST: Ulysses could have done with a good editor. . . .People are always putting Ulysses
in the top 10 books ever written, but I doubt that any of those people
were really moved by it. . . . If you’re a writer in Dublin and you
write a snatch of dialogue, everyone thinks you lifted it from Joyce.
The whole idea that he owns language as it is spoken in Dublin is a
nonsense. He didn’t invent the Dublin accent. It’s as if you’re
encroaching on his area or it’s a given that he’s on your shoulder. It
gets on my nerves.
–Roddy Doyle, at a James Joyce birthday celebration in 2004 ... [mehr] http://lithub.com/ulysses-good-or-bad/
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen