Rejecting the Authors Guild’s appeal of Judge Denny Chin’s 2013 ruling in favor of Google, the court said that Google’s scanning and distributing the titles to libraries was a 'transformative use which augments public knowledge by making available information about Plaintiff’s books.' The court rejected the guild’s contention that Google was providing a substitute for the works themselves, because Google’s public display of text is limited. The court also supported Google’s use of “snippets,” short passages displayed to help identify the works, and noted that “Google’s commercial nature and profit motivation do not justify denial of fair use.”
Publishers Weekly Oct 16, 2015
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen